<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Text Link Ads are they being punished?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seounique.com/blog/text-link-ads-are-they-being-punished/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seounique.com/blog/text-link-ads-are-they-being-punished/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:09:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.seounique.com/blog/text-link-ads-are-they-being-punished/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seounique.com/blog/?p=36#comment-422</guid>
		<description>As Google has told us, if we add &#039;rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&#039; to our tags, we&#039;re fine.  So if your advertisers are really buying text links for advertising and not just link-love, there&#039;s no problem..  so it&#039;s not really about selling links, it&#039;s about selling PR.

But how does Google know that any link isn&#039;t for that reason?  I have a large page of Unix and Linux Consultants.. it&#039;s a free listing, so I&#039;m not &quot;selling&quot; anything, but Google doesn&#039;t know that, and they don&#039;t know WHY I do this, so I have to add &quot;nofollow&quot; to those too..

And then what about Book and Product reviews?  Google might misinterpret that also, so I add it there too..  and then I realize this is silly:  I might as well add &quot;nofollow&quot; everywhere!

More at http://aplawrence.com/Web/more_google_slap.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Google has told us, if we add &#8216;rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;&#8216; to our tags, we&#8217;re fine.  So if your advertisers are really buying text links for advertising and not just link-love, there&#8217;s no problem..  so it&#8217;s not really about selling links, it&#8217;s about selling PR.</p>
<p>But how does Google know that any link isn&#8217;t for that reason?  I have a large page of Unix and Linux Consultants.. it&#8217;s a free listing, so I&#8217;m not &#8220;selling&#8221; anything, but Google doesn&#8217;t know that, and they don&#8217;t know WHY I do this, so I have to add &#8220;nofollow&#8221; to those too..</p>
<p>And then what about Book and Product reviews?  Google might misinterpret that also, so I add it there too..  and then I realize this is silly:  I might as well add &#8220;nofollow&#8221; everywhere!</p>
<p>More at <a href="http://aplawrence.com/Web/more_google_slap.html" rel="nofollow">http://aplawrence.com/Web/more_google_slap.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
