<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is content Key anymore?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seounique.com/blog/is-content-key-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seounique.com/blog/is-content-key-anymore/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.seounique.com/blog/is-content-key-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seounique.com/blog/?p=39#comment-284</guid>
		<description>@ The Gypsy - It depends what content you are referring to? I have worked on a clients website that includes 80 updates per month all with high quality unique content and have seen no major changes in SERP positions. I think that your point about virtual Digg is probably spot on and is what I was getting at - content that is of good quality produces effects such as linking and bookmarking - maybe these are now considered more than just the quality alone?

Thanks for the post though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ The Gypsy &#8211; It depends what content you are referring to? I have worked on a clients website that includes 80 updates per month all with high quality unique content and have seen no major changes in SERP positions. I think that your point about virtual Digg is probably spot on and is what I was getting at &#8211; content that is of good quality produces effects such as linking and bookmarking &#8211; maybe these are now considered more than just the quality alone?</p>
<p>Thanks for the post though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theGypsy</title>
		<link>http://www.seounique.com/blog/is-content-key-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>theGypsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seounique.com/blog/?p=39#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Ok, I have to say that Content is more valuable now more than ever. I just finished up a 4 part series on personalized search and have worked on other Google patents relating to User Performance Metrics. Bill Slawski and others gave a presentation on these areas earlier this week at PubCon. There is much to be considered and quality content will certainly be at a premium moving forward. Content may once again be King…  You can get more here; http://www.huomah.com/search-engines/search-engine-optimization/the-art-of-personalized-search-optimization.html

Part of ranking in such scenarios is the quality of the offering. Think in terms of a virtual Digg setting where user actions and interactions have an effect on how rankings are derived. 

Just thought I’d mention it in passing. 

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I have to say that Content is more valuable now more than ever. I just finished up a 4 part series on personalized search and have worked on other Google patents relating to User Performance Metrics. Bill Slawski and others gave a presentation on these areas earlier this week at PubCon. There is much to be considered and quality content will certainly be at a premium moving forward. Content may once again be King…  You can get more here; <a href="http://www.huomah.com/search-engines/search-engine-optimization/the-art-of-personalized-search-optimization.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huomah.com/search-engines/search-engine-optimization/the-art-of-personalized-search-optimization.html</a></p>
<p>Part of ranking in such scenarios is the quality of the offering. Think in terms of a virtual Digg setting where user actions and interactions have an effect on how rankings are derived. </p>
<p>Just thought I’d mention it in passing. </p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.seounique.com/blog/is-content-key-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seounique.com/blog/?p=39#comment-280</guid>
		<description>I sorta agree and disagree.  Great Content can play an equal role for targeting keywords if it builds natural links.  At the end of the day though it is links that play the biggest role in SERP position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sorta agree and disagree.  Great Content can play an equal role for targeting keywords if it builds natural links.  At the end of the day though it is links that play the biggest role in SERP position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.seounique.com/blog/is-content-key-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seounique.com/blog/?p=39#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Good take on this Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good take on this Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
