<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are the basics of seo being ignored by Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seounique.com/blog/are-the-basics-of-seo-being-ignored-by-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seounique.com/blog/are-the-basics-of-seo-being-ignored-by-google/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:09:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.seounique.com/blog/are-the-basics-of-seo-being-ignored-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seounique.com/blog/?p=32#comment-285</guid>
		<description>Without knowing more about the keywords you&#039;re ranking for, it&#039;s hard to qualify that aspect of your SEO activities.

What&#039;s worth mentioning is that it&#039;s not just SEO itself that a website will rank for, which I suspect you already know.

But if you&#039;re getting a lot of in-bound traffic that&#039;s not organic search traffic, but instead as a result of SEM, Social Media, or other link building tactics, then any SEO deficiencies will be &quot;defeated&quot; and overcome by those other traffic channels.

You&#039;re dealing with a website that&#039;s a portal for unsigned musicians. I suspect the search traffic you&#039;re getting isn&#039;t for those guys by name.

So in those instances, the best channels are word-of-mouth, links on other music portals, emails, Facebook et cetera, which may be as a result of the artists themselves.

As I said, without knowing more, I can only make a best guess...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without knowing more about the keywords you&#8217;re ranking for, it&#8217;s hard to qualify that aspect of your SEO activities.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s worth mentioning is that it&#8217;s not just SEO itself that a website will rank for, which I suspect you already know.</p>
<p>But if you&#8217;re getting a lot of in-bound traffic that&#8217;s not organic search traffic, but instead as a result of SEM, Social Media, or other link building tactics, then any SEO deficiencies will be &#8220;defeated&#8221; and overcome by those other traffic channels.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re dealing with a website that&#8217;s a portal for unsigned musicians. I suspect the search traffic you&#8217;re getting isn&#8217;t for those guys by name.</p>
<p>So in those instances, the best channels are word-of-mouth, links on other music portals, emails, Facebook et cetera, which may be as a result of the artists themselves.</p>
<p>As I said, without knowing more, I can only make a best guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan the Automator</title>
		<link>http://www.seounique.com/blog/are-the-basics-of-seo-being-ignored-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan the Automator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seounique.com/blog/?p=32#comment-248</guid>
		<description>The most obvious reason I&#039;d come up with is that you haven&#039;t over-optimised your site... there&#039;s nothing worse than looking like a &#039;try-hard&#039; ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most obvious reason I&#8217;d come up with is that you haven&#8217;t over-optimised your site&#8230; there&#8217;s nothing worse than looking like a &#8216;try-hard&#8217; <img src='http://www.seounique.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
